From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Corrected Workqueue freezer support. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:56:09 -0500 Message-ID: <200507210056.09515.dtor_core@ameritech.net> References: <1121923979.2939.237.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============017785074534728107==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1121923979.2939.237.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, ncunningham@cyclades.com Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============017785074534728107== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:32, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > (Fixed to remove the latent mention of syncthreads). > > This patch implements freezer support for workqueues. The current > refrigerator implementation makes all workqueues NOFREEZE, regardless of > whether they need to be or not. > I think kseriod and kgameportd threads can be left freezable. -- Dmitry --===============017785074534728107== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============017785074534728107==--