From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: PowerOP 2/3: Intel Centrino support Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:01:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20050810100133.GA1945@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050809025419.GC25064@slurryseal.ddns.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============53438091708394664==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050809025419.GC25064@slurryseal.ddns.mvista.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Todd Poynor Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============53438091708394664== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! > Minimal PowerOP support for Intel Enhanced Speedstep "Centrino" > notebooks. These systems run at an operating point comprised of a cpu > frequency and a core voltage. The voltage could be set from the values > recommended in the datasheets if left unspecified (-1) in the operating > point, as cpufreq does. Eh? I thought these are handled okay by cpufreq already? What is advantage of this over cpufreq? Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address --===============53438091708394664== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============53438091708394664==--