From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] power trees
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050821140034.GA3039@openzaurus.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1123735844.4380.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2047 bytes --]
Hi!
> My implementation has two primary goals:
>
> 1.) To help device drivers track and control their device's power state
>
> 2.) To bubble power state dependency changes from a leaf node to the
> last affected parent node in the chain.
>
> The basic unit of the tree is referred to as a "pm_node". Each
> "pm_node" has a list of states it supports, a current state, and a
> driver to handle state transitions. Any "pm_node" can have children and
> therefore act as a power container.
>
> struct pm_state {
> char *name;
> unsigned long index;
> unsigned long link_req;
> void *link_data;
> };
>
> "index" is a driver specific value that indicates the state. "link_req"
> is a set of flags that indicate requirements from the parent "pm_node".
> "link_data" provides additional requirement information.
>
> struct pm_node {
> struct semaphore sem;
> struct list_head children;
> struct list_head child_list;
> struct pm_node *parent;
> struct pm_node *tmp_path;
> struct device *dev;
>
> struct pm_node_driver *drv;
> unsigned int current_state;
> unsigned int target_state;
Would not it be cleaner to have struct pm_state *current_state, target state?
> "states" is a list of power states sorted from most functional to least
> functional. "current_state" and "target_state" are index values for
> that list.
>
> struct pm_node_driver {
> int (*set_state) (struct pm_node *node);
> int (*raise_event) (struct pm_node *domain,
> struct pm_node *child,
> unsigned long *new_state);
struct pm_state here, too?
> void (*lower_event) (struct pm_node *domain);
> };
>
> "raise_event" notifies the power domain when a child has increased its
"Increase" == went more power hungry?
> I apologize for the unpolished/untested state of the code as it's
> primarily intended to illustrate a concept. I'll need to look over the
> problem more carefully if we decide this is the right direction. Power
Seems ok to me.
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-21 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 4:50 [RFC] power trees Adam Belay
2005-08-11 18:29 ` Greg KH
2005-08-21 14:00 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-08-21 16:15 ` Alan Stern
2005-08-21 17:37 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-26 23:37 ` Alan Stern
2005-08-27 2:42 ` David Brownell
2005-08-31 10:42 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050821140034.GA3039@openzaurus.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox