From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Re: swsusp3: system suspend/resume from userspace Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:54:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20050902045457.GI9713@kroah.com> References: <20050901110539.GA1926@elf.ucw.cz> <1125575747.4785.20.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============14299954934304404==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1125575747.4785.20.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============14299954934304404== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:55:48PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > - Aren't new syscalls generally viewed as pretty undesirable? No, not for new things like this. If it warrents it. Look at how many new syscalls 2.6.13 added. thanks, greg k-h --===============14299954934304404== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============14299954934304404==--