From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jordan Crouse" Subject: Re: Runtime PM support for named power states Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:08:30 -0600 Message-ID: <20051003160830.GA19720@cosmic.amd.com> References: <20051002204310.GC2239@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============42976087991734735==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============42976087991734735== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Thank you. It's a start, anyway. My real question is: Is this the right > way to go? My two cents are that its definately a thrust in the right direction. The important thing is that it makes the devices start thinking about how to transition between power states outside of a system level event. This is mandatory infrastructure, regardless of the higher level policy management (or lack thereof) that we eventually agree upon. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Senior Linux Engineer AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group --===============42976087991734735== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============42976087991734735==--