From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [RFC] userland swsusp Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:40:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20051115234007.GO17023@redhat.com> References: <20051115212942.GA9828@elf.ucw.cz> <20051115222549.GF17023@redhat.com> <20051115233201.GA10143@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============25785901316227644==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20051115233201.GA10143@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , kernel list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============25785901316227644== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:32:01AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > If this goes in, you can still keep using old method... I'll not > remove it anytime soon. Ok. > > Even it were not for this, the whole idea seems misconcieved to me > > anyway. > > ...but how do you provide nice, graphical progress bar for swsusp > without this? People want that, and "esc to abort", compression, > encryption. Too much to be done in kernel space, IMNSHO. I'll take "rootkit doesnt work" over "bells and whistles". I think most users actually care more about "works" than "looks pretty, and then fails spectacularly". Dave --===============25785901316227644== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============25785901316227644==--