From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC] userland swsusp Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:10:52 +0000 Message-ID: <20051116191051.GG2193@spitz.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============73541056070751876==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Gross, Mark" Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , kernel list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============73541056070751876== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! > I worry that this is just adding more thrash to a historically unstable > implementation. How long do we users have to wait for a swsusp > implementation where we don't have to worry about breaking from one > kernel release to the next? What unstable implementation? swsusp had very little regressions over past year or so. Drivers were different story, but nothing changes w.r.t. drivers. Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms --===============73541056070751876== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============73541056070751876==--