From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC] userland swsusp Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:41:03 +0100 Message-ID: <200511162341.04652.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20051116220500.GF12505@elf.ucw.cz> <1132175574.25230.111.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3540581371503797==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1132175574.25230.111.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: ncunningham@cyclades.com Cc: Dave Jones , Linux-pm mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============3540581371503797== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, On Wednesday, 16 of November 2005 22:13, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 09:05, Pavel Machek wrote: }-- snip --{ > > So... to get 225 patches in, you'll need to explain that > > userland-swsusp can't work. If you can do that, please be nice and do > > it soon, so that I don't waste too much time on userland-swsusp. > > I thought Dave already did that. Not as far as I'm concerned. He criticised the implementation, which I generally agree with, but IMO the overall idea is not wrong. BTW, you don't need to export the page flags, use /dev/kmem etc. to implement it. The only concern that I have wrt it is the writing of the image _after_ the system has been snapshotted. Greetings, Rafael --===============3540581371503797== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============3540581371503797==--