From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [RFC] userland swsusp Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:18:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20051117211856.GS5856@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <1132172445.25230.73.camel@localhost> <20051116220500.GF12505@elf.ucw.cz> <20051117170202.GB10402@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1132257432.4438.8.camel@mindpipe> <20051117201204.GA32376@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <1132258855.4438.11.camel@mindpipe> <20051117203731.GG5772@redhat.com> <1132260851.5959.15.camel@mindpipe> <20051117210643.GG7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1132262060.5959.21.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============53968820309609189==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1132262060.5959.21.camel@mindpipe> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Lee Revell Cc: Chris Wright , Linux-pm mailing list , Olivier Galibert , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============53968820309609189== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline * Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote: > OK I should not single out Red Hat or OSDL, it just seems like we get a > lot more general gripes about ALSA regressions than we see good bug > reports. All I am saying is that maybe someone from a distro with > access to bug reports from a huge user base has some ideas for how we > could better deal with these regressions. The ALSA project does not get > many good bug reports because we are farther from the users. Yeah, bad bug reports are indeed a pain. One thing that may help ALSA is more frequent merging with mainline. Then the delta between ALSA cvs (and hence ALSA developers) and mainline (users) is smaller. --===============53968820309609189== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============53968820309609189==--