From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:56:13 -0800 Message-ID: <20051117215612.GA8797@kroah.com> References: <20051116191051.GG2193@spitz.ucw.cz> <20051117165437.GA10402@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20051117164451.GA27178@kroah.com> <20051117201509.GA25250@finwe.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051117201509.GA25250@finwe.eu.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:15:09PM +0100, Jacek Kawa wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > What unstable implementation? swsusp had very little regressions over past > > > > year or so. Drivers were different story, but nothing changes w.r.t. drivers. > > > Do you mean swsusp is actually supposed to work? Suspend-to-ram, > > > suspend-to-disk or both? > > Both. -to-ram depends on your video chip, but to-disk should work just > > fine. If not, please report bugs. > > Thanks, I've just realized, that I probably forgot to CC anyone last time... > :) > > So, may I kindly ask to look on: > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0511.1/1863.html ? Care to file this in bugzilla.kernel.org and assign it to Pavel? thanks, greg k-h