From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: Re: Hotplug events during sleep transition Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:52:21 -0500 Message-ID: <200512251152.23242.dtor_core@ameritech.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Linux-pm mailing list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 25 December 2005 11:43, Alan Stern wrote: > > It is not *that* bad, actually. In system suspend/resume cases, no ne= w > > I/O requests can happen, because userspace is frozen. Because of > > runtime suspend, you should handle I/O errors properly, but you shoul= d > > handle I/O errors properly, anyway, so... looks like a solution to me. >=20 > You're right, it's not really all that bad. =A0Note however that in the= PPC > implementation, Ben H. does not freeze userspace before suspend to RAM. >=20 Do we freeze processes before STR on i386? --=20 Dmitry