public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:53:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060106085318.GH3339@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060106011041.GA23899@isilmar.linta.de>

On Pá 06-01-06 02:10:41, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:04:07PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> > A better point, and one that would actually be useful, would be to remove
> > the file altogether. Let Dominik export a power file, with complete
> > control over the values, for each pcmcia device. Then you never have to
> > worry about breaking PCMCIA again.
> 
> Then I'll try to push this into 2.6.16 later on; also I still need to fix
> up userspace accordingly...
> 
> BTW, ACK on the removal of power/state from me... PCMCIA shouldn't hold this
> removal up.

Thanks.

> 	Dominik
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
> index 0252582..a4f3258 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
> @@ -920,6 +920,37 @@ pcmcia_device_stringattr(prod_id2, prod_
>  pcmcia_device_stringattr(prod_id3, prod_id[2]);
>  pcmcia_device_stringattr(prod_id4, prod_id[3]);
>  
> +
> +static ssize_t pcmcia_show_suspend(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct pcmcia_device *p_dev = to_pcmcia_dev(dev);
> +
> +	if (p_dev->dev.power.power_state.event != PM_EVENT_ON)
> +		return sprintf(buf, "1\n");
> +	else
> +		return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
> +}

Could we get something like 'on' / 'off', or something else less
ambiquous than 0/1?

> +static ssize_t pcmcia_store_suspend(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				    const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct pcmcia_device *p_dev = to_pcmcia_dev(dev);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +        if (!count)
> +                return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (p_dev->dev.power.power_state.event == PM_EVENT_ON)
> +		ret = dpm_runtime_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> +	else
> +		dpm_runtime_resume(dev);

So *any* write into this file just toggles suspend status? That seems
remarkably ugly. The other hunk has same issue.

> +	return ret ? ret : count;
> +
> +	return count;

Not reachable.
								Pavel
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-27 21:34 [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface Pavel Machek
2005-12-27 21:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-27 22:05   ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-28  4:22     ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-04 21:34       ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-01-04 22:06         ` Alan Stern
2006-01-04 22:16           ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 21:43           ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 22:06             ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2006-01-05 22:28               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 21:42         ` [linux-pm] " Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 21:55           ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 22:13             ` [linux-pm] " Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 22:23               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 22:27                 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 22:59                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:08                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:46                     ` [linux-pm] " Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 23:58                       ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06  0:04                         ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-06  0:12                           ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06  1:37                             ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-06  8:59                               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07  5:47                                 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06  9:00                               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 15:00                               ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-07  5:58                                 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06 15:42                               ` Alan Stern
2006-01-07  0:08                                 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07  3:19                                   ` Alan Stern
2006-01-07  7:58                                   ` Adam Belay
2006-01-07 10:20                                     ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 13:06                                       ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06  4:17                                         ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07  7:41                                 ` [linux-pm] " Adam Belay
2006-01-07 15:24                                   ` Alan Stern
2006-01-06  1:10                           ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-06  8:53                             ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-01-06  0:38                   ` Greg KH
2006-01-06 15:03                     ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-06 16:25                       ` Kay Sievers
2006-01-09 20:10                         ` [linux-pm] " Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 22:15             ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 22:44               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:54                 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-06  0:07                   ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 14:34             ` Tom Marshall
2006-01-06 16:20               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07  8:36         ` Adam Belay
2006-01-07 10:25           ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 12:45             ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06  4:24               ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-13 20:00                 ` Takashi Iwai
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 15:16 Scott E. Preece
2006-01-05 22:21 Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-01-05 22:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06  0:02 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 22:55 Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-01-05 23:05 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06  0:31 Scott E. Preece

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060106085318.GH3339@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox