From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:53:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060106085318.GH3339@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060106011041.GA23899@isilmar.linta.de>
On Pá 06-01-06 02:10:41, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:04:07PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> > A better point, and one that would actually be useful, would be to remove
> > the file altogether. Let Dominik export a power file, with complete
> > control over the values, for each pcmcia device. Then you never have to
> > worry about breaking PCMCIA again.
>
> Then I'll try to push this into 2.6.16 later on; also I still need to fix
> up userspace accordingly...
>
> BTW, ACK on the removal of power/state from me... PCMCIA shouldn't hold this
> removal up.
Thanks.
> Dominik
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
> index 0252582..a4f3258 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c
> @@ -920,6 +920,37 @@ pcmcia_device_stringattr(prod_id2, prod_
> pcmcia_device_stringattr(prod_id3, prod_id[2]);
> pcmcia_device_stringattr(prod_id4, prod_id[3]);
>
> +
> +static ssize_t pcmcia_show_suspend(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct pcmcia_device *p_dev = to_pcmcia_dev(dev);
> +
> + if (p_dev->dev.power.power_state.event != PM_EVENT_ON)
> + return sprintf(buf, "1\n");
> + else
> + return sprintf(buf, "0\n");
> +}
Could we get something like 'on' / 'off', or something else less
ambiquous than 0/1?
> +static ssize_t pcmcia_store_suspend(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct pcmcia_device *p_dev = to_pcmcia_dev(dev);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!count)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (p_dev->dev.power.power_state.event == PM_EVENT_ON)
> + ret = dpm_runtime_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
> + else
> + dpm_runtime_resume(dev);
So *any* write into this file just toggles suspend status? That seems
remarkably ugly. The other hunk has same issue.
> + return ret ? ret : count;
> +
> + return count;
Not reachable.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-27 21:34 [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface Pavel Machek
2005-12-27 21:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-27 22:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-28 4:22 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-04 21:34 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-01-04 22:06 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-04 22:16 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 21:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 22:06 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2006-01-05 22:28 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 21:42 ` [linux-pm] " Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 21:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 22:13 ` [linux-pm] " Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 22:23 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 22:27 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 22:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:46 ` [linux-pm] " Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 23:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 0:04 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-06 0:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 1:37 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-06 8:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 5:47 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 15:00 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-07 5:58 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-07 0:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 3:19 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-07 7:58 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-07 10:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 13:06 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06 4:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 7:41 ` [linux-pm] " Adam Belay
2006-01-07 15:24 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-06 1:10 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-06 8:53 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-01-06 0:38 ` Greg KH
2006-01-06 15:03 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-06 16:25 ` Kay Sievers
2006-01-09 20:10 ` [linux-pm] " Dominik Brodowski
2006-01-05 22:15 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:54 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-06 0:07 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 14:34 ` Tom Marshall
2006-01-06 16:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 8:36 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-07 10:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-07 12:45 ` Adam Belay
2006-01-06 4:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-13 20:00 ` Takashi Iwai
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 15:16 Scott E. Preece
2006-01-05 22:21 Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-01-05 22:45 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 0:02 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-01-05 22:55 Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-01-05 23:05 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 0:31 Scott E. Preece
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060106085318.GH3339@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox