Re: [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface

Scott E. Preece
2006-01-06T00:31:11Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1581 bytes --]

OK - sorry, my misparsing of what you asked. I agree that wakeup would
always be caused by some single device, not by multiple devices.

scott

| From mochel@digitalimplant.org Thu Jan 5 18:04:42 2006
| Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:02:29 -0800 (PST)
| From: Patrick Mochel<mochel@digitalimplant.org>
| cc: Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz>, Alan Stern<stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
|
|
| On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Preece Scott-PREECE wrote:
|
| > This is, of course, in an embedded framework rather than a desktop
| > framework - we suspend and wakeup automatically, not via user
| > intervention. Answering a question asked in another piece of mail, we
| > have roughly a dozen different devices that cause the system to wakeup -
| > keypad press, touchscreen touch, flip open/close, etc.
|
| Hmm, it would be nice if that comment was in reply to the email in which
| it came. At least if it was in the same thread..
|
| Many systems have > 1 _possible_ wakeup devices (keyboard, touchscreen,
| lid, etc). You implied that when a system wakes up, there could be > 1
| device that actually woke the system up, which is in direct conflict with
| what I've always assumed - that when a system wakes up, it is caused by a
| single device (and if there were multiple events, like a key press *and* a
| mouse movement, it's doesn't really matter)..
|
| Thanks,
|
|
| Patrick
|
|

--
scott preece
motorola mobile devices, il67, 1800 s. oak st., champaign, il 61820
e-mail: preece@motorola.com fax: +1-217-384-8550
phone: +1-217-384-8589 cell: +1-217-433-6114 pager: 2174336114@vtext.com