public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@osdl.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 0/5] swsusp: userland interface (rev. 2)
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:17:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601062217.09012.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060105233026.GA3339@elf.ucw.cz>

Hi,

On Friday, 6 January 2006 00:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > This is the second "preview release" of the swsusp userland interface patches.
> > They have changed quite a bit since the previous post, as I tried to make the
> > interface more robust against some potential user space bugs (or outright
> > attempts to abuse it).
> 
> Works for me, thanks.
> 
> Perhaps it is time to get 1/4 and 3/4 into -mm? You get my signed-off
> on them...

OK, I'll prepare them in a while.

> 2/4 needs to allocate official major/minor. 1/13 would be nice :-).

Well, you said you liked the patch with a misc device (ie. major = 10).

Actually the code is somewhat simpler in that case so I'd prefer it.

Now, if we used a misc device, which minor would be suitable?  231?

> 4/4... I'm not sure. It would be nice to make swsusp.c disappear. It
> is really wrong name. That means we need to only delete from it for a
> while...

Anyway I think it would be nice to move the code that does not really belong
to the snapshot and is used by both the user interface and disk.c/swap.c to
a separate file.  I have no preference as far as the name of the file is
concerned, though.

Greetings,
Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-04 22:40 [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 0/5] swsusp: userland interface (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-04 22:47 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 1/5] swsusp: swsusp: low level " Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-04 22:51 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 2/5] swsusp: userland " Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-04 23:49   ` [linux-pm] " Greg KH
2006-01-05  0:18     ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05  0:26       ` Greg KH
2006-01-05  0:54         ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05  0:55         ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-05 23:45           ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:53 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 3/5] swsusp: separate swap-writing and reading code " Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-04 22:55 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 4/5] swsusp: move highmem-handling code to swsusp.c " Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-04 22:56 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 5/5] swsusp: userland interface documentation and config Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-05  1:05 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 0/5] swsusp: userland interface (rev. 2) Pavel Machek
2006-01-05 23:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 21:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2006-01-06 22:44     ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-06 23:41       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-06 23:59         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200601062217.09012.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@osdl.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox