From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 0/5] swsusp: userland interface (rev. 2) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:17:08 +0100 Message-ID: <200601062217.09012.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200601042340.42118.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060105233026.GA3339@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060105233026.GA3339@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linux PM , LKML List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Friday, 6 January 2006 00:30, Pavel Machek wrote: > > This is the second "preview release" of the swsusp userland interface patches. > > They have changed quite a bit since the previous post, as I tried to make the > > interface more robust against some potential user space bugs (or outright > > attempts to abuse it). > > Works for me, thanks. > > Perhaps it is time to get 1/4 and 3/4 into -mm? You get my signed-off > on them... OK, I'll prepare them in a while. > 2/4 needs to allocate official major/minor. 1/13 would be nice :-). Well, you said you liked the patch with a misc device (ie. major = 10). Actually the code is somewhat simpler in that case so I'd prefer it. Now, if we used a misc device, which minor would be suitable? 231? > 4/4... I'm not sure. It would be nice to make swsusp.c disappear. It > is really wrong name. That means we need to only delete from it for a > while... Anyway I think it would be nice to move the code that does not really belong to the snapshot and is used by both the user interface and disk.c/swap.c to a separate file. I have no preference as far as the name of the file is concerned, though. Greetings, Rafael