From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:55:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20060218155543.GE5658@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============23359861243786018==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Patrick Mochel Cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============23359861243786018== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! > Fix the per-device state file to respect the actual state that > is reported by the device, or written to the file. Can we let "state" file die? You actually suggested that at one point. I do not think passing states in u32 is good idea. New interface that passes state as string would probably be better. Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms --===============23359861243786018== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============23359861243786018==--