From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: oliver@neukum.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, psusi@cfl.rr.com,
pavel@suse.cz, torvalds@osdl.org, mrmacman_g4@mac.com,
alon.barlev@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:57:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060219235752.2d6e252c.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060219232926.256665d6.akpm@osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 992 bytes --]
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> > If you simply block writes, the system will stall random tasks laundering
> > pages, including those needed to make progress. Even syncing before
> > suspend won't help you, as a running user space may dirty pages.
>
> Well of _course_ that will happen.
Actually, it won't happen. There's already logic in there to help pdflush,
kswapd and memory-allocating tasks avoid blocking on congested queues.
It's trivial to extend that to avoidance of hotunplugged queues.
Things like sync(), fsync(), O_SYNC and reads will necessarily block.
We may or may not decide to block on page-dirtyings. Again, that's trivial
to do in balance_dirty_pages().
Race conditions are pretty much unavoidable - if someone goes and disables
a device when we're partway through and committed to I/O submission then
things will get very sticky. But we can have a pretty successful solution
to all of this without a ton of effort.
But this is all the easy part.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-20 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060217210445.GR3490@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
2006-02-18 21:04 ` Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? Alan Stern
2006-02-19 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-19 6:02 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-19 16:39 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 16:54 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-19 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-19 20:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-02-19 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-20 6:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-02-20 7:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-20 7:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] <200602132327.10475.rjw@sisk.pl>
2006-02-14 19:26 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-14 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-14 21:08 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15 15:56 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060219235752.2d6e252c.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alon.barlev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox