From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:41:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060220004142.GI15608@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0602191628270.8676-100000@monsoon.he.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 996 bytes --]
On Ne 19-02-06 16:36:34, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > On Ne 19-02-06 16:17:01, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> > > I really fail to see what your fundamental objection is. This restores
> > > compatability, makes the core simpler, and adds the ability to use the
> > > additional states, should drivers choose to implement them; all for
> > > relatively little code. It seems a like a good thing to me..
> >
> > Compatibility is already restored.
>
> No, the interface is currently broken. The driver core does not
> dictate
There were two different interfaces, one accepted 0 and 2, everything
else was invalid, and second accepted 0, 1, 2, 3.
If you enter D2 on echo 2, you are breaking compatibility with 2.6.15
or something like that.
Please let this interface die and create new one. (And notice that
this is exactly same advice you gave me month ago).
Pavel
--
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-20 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-18 2:03 [PATCH 3/5] [pm] Respect the actual device power states in sysfs interface Patrick Mochel
2006-02-18 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-19 23:59 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-20 0:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-20 0:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-20 0:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-20 0:36 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-20 0:41 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-02-20 17:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-20 17:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-20 18:08 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-20 18:10 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-02-20 0:46 ` Greg KH
2006-02-20 17:58 ` [linux-pm] " Patrick Mochel
2006-02-20 22:04 ` Greg KH
2006-02-21 1:09 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-21 10:57 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-21 11:12 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-21 11:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-27 19:06 ` Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060220004142.GI15608@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@osdl.org \
--cc=mochel@digitalimplant.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox