From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: warn about USB devices in documentation Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:41:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20060220204105.GC21557@elf.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============92864120950724383==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Alan Stern Cc: Linux PM List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============92864120950724383== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Po 20-02-06 15:30:16, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Patrick Mochel wrote: > > > > And if the computer can wake up in response to USB events, then obviously > > > the USB controller _is_ receiving some power. > > > > True, and I apologize if I misunderstood your initial question. By "up", I > > thought you meant fully powered and functional. > > No; in the context of this thread I merely meant suspend-power was > present. Pavel had said that a machine which supplies any USB power at > all during swsusp is broken. I was trying to show this isn't so. I take that back. I still claim it is unusal ;-). Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... --===============92864120950724383== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============92864120950724383==--