Re: [patch/rft 2.6.17-rc2] swsusp resume must not device_suspend()

Patrick Mochel
2006-05-02T16:12:08Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:41:28PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:

> There does seem to be agreement that the current FREEE invocation is not
> sufficient. I'm looking at a slightly different solution now ... one which
> unfortunately involves changing drivers, but can indeed allow swsusp resume
> paths to do the right thing (instead of what it does now).

It's Ok if it involves a drive change, so long as its an optional change, which
means that it shouldn't affect the interface very much (i.e. the calling
convention). That's why it'd be good to augment and/or modify pm_message_t
to implement the changes, so we wouldn't have to change every single driver
again..

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]