From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: support creating bigger images Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:43:02 +0200 Message-ID: <200604260043.03481.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200604242355.08111.rjw@sisk.pl> <200604260021.08888.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060425222526.GG6379@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060425222526.GG6379@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Nick Piggin , LKML , Linux PM List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wednesday 26 April 2006 00:25, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > It does apply to all of the LRU pages. This is what I've been doing for years > > > now. The only corner case I've come across is XFS. It still wants to write > > > data even when there's nothing to do and it's threads are frozen (IIRC - > > > haven't looked at it for a while). I got around that by freezing bdevs when > > > freezing processes. > > > > This means if we freeze bdevs, we'll be able to save all of the LRU pages, > > except for the pages mapped by the current task, without copying. I think we > > can try to do this, but we'll need a patch to freeze bdevs for this purpose. ;-) > > ...adding more dependencies to how vm/blockdevs work. I'd say current > code is complex enough... Well, why don't we see the patch? If it's too complex, we can just decide not to use it. :-) Greetings, Rafael