Re: Re: [PATCH/rfc] schedule /sys/device/.../power for removal

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1587 bytes --]

On Ne 14-05-06 08:51:26, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 13 May 2006 5:13 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 06:52 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Friday 12 May 2006 3:11 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > What will be impacted by this?
> > > 
> > > Driver suspend/resume testing ... impact is strongly negative.
> > > ...
> > > Which IMO makes removing this a Bad Thing.  It needs to have some
> > > kind of replacement in place before the "magic numbers" go away.
> > 
> > And that's why Pavel is not proposing to remove it right away... but to
> > schedule it's removal so that developpers know right now that building a
> > whole new kernel<->user interface based on that is not the smartest
> > thing to do.
> 
> How could we schedule the removal before we have even had a couple
> releases to fine-tune its replacement, and verify that the main issues
> with the current thing are fully resolved?
> 
> ... plus, removing the whole power/* directory is clearly wrong.  The
> issue that's been acknowledged is only with the contents of a single
> file, power/state, not the whole directory.

Sorry, I meant only ../state file. Fixed locally.

> There may be a bit of a gap in the process here.  "July 2007" is a
> date that's not backed up by anything more than agreement that the
> current approach is a lose.  Deprecation is not the same as removal.

Maybe date will need to be shifted...
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]