From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: swsusp regression [Was: 2.6.17-mm1] Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:25:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20060622092506.da2a8bf4.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060621034857.35cfe36f.akpm@osdl.org> <4499BE99.6010508@gmail.com> <20060621221445.GB3798@inferi.kami.home> <20060622061905.GD15834@kroah.com> <20060622004648.f1912e34.akpm@osdl.org> <20060622160403.GB2539@slug> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060622160403.GB2539@slug> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Frederik Deweerdt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:04:03 +0200 Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:46:48AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I can bisect it if we're stuck, but that'll require beer or something. > = > FWIW, my laptop (Dell D610) gave the following results: > 2.6.17-mm1: suspend_device(): usb_generic_suspend+0x0/0x135 [usbcore]() r= eturns -16 > 2.6.17+origin.patch: suspend_device(): usb_generic_suspend+0x0/0x135 [usb= core]() returns -16 So it's in mainline already - hence it's some recently-written thing which was not tested in rc6-mm2. > 2.6.17: oops > 2.6.17.1: oops 2.6.17 wasn't supposed to oops. Do you have details on this? > 2.6.17-rc6-mm2: suspends correctly Good kernel, that.