From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix console handling during suspend/resume Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:30:10 -0700 Message-ID: <200606232030.11497.david-b@pacbell.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Friday 23 June 2006 5:10 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote: > = > It's clear that people who I thought should know better are just too used = > to the status quo, and as such, any change is automatically a bad thing. Loosely defined changes are hard to support. It's unclear which of the not= ions (or versions thereof) that have been discussed are ones you're actually sug= gesting should happen, or what the overall impact of them would be. > I think it's a failure that I have to do things like that myself, but in = > the end, I don't much care. I've fixed up USB and PCMCIA messes for the = > same reasons in the past. So have we all. It makes us want to avoid large scale changes that cause a need to retest things, since adequate retesting even on _one_ of the affected platform configurations can take so long. - Dave