From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix console handling duringsuspend/resume Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:59:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20060629225946.GC26175@kroah.com> References: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D019DE2D5@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D019DE2D5@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Gross, Mark" Cc: David Brownell , Linus Torvalds , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:13:03PM -0700, Gross, Mark wrote: > >AS FAR AS I CAN TELL the patch won't actually change any behaviour (I > have > >actually been running for the last few days with the separate patch > that > >_does_ do that - moves the PCI config suspend/resume to the late/early > >rsume phase), but hey, mistakes happen. > > > = > Shouldn't this type of thing go through the MM-tree first for these > reasons? Good point, that's probably the correct way to do this for such a core change. thanks, greg k-h