From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: memcpy() in swsusp (was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix console handling during suspend/resume) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:06:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20060706220612.GC30500@redhat.com> References: <20060706210101.GU13168@redhat.com> <200607061407.56004.david-b@pacbell.net> <200607062318.55787.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200607062318.55787.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: David Brownell , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Nigel Cunningham , Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday 06 July 2006 23:07, David Brownell wrote: > > On Thursday 06 July 2006 2:01 pm, Dave Jones wrote: > > = > > > Why not just use __memcpy instead? Which should be safe on all archs > > > to do the simplest possible memcpy. > > = > > Or __constant_memcpy(...PAGE_SIZE) ? :) > = > Is __memcpy() defined on all architectures? Eg. ppc? Seems not. __constant_memcpy is a gcc built-in though isn't it ? Dave -- = http://www.codemonkey.org.uk