public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: RFC -- updated Documentation/power/devices.txt
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:40:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060711144015.GA1616@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607101525.43507.david-b@pacbell.net>

Hi!

> When I did those PM_EVENT_PRETHAW updates I did the Right Thing and
> started to update its in-tree documentation too.  Seems I'm the first
> person to do that in a long time ... anyway, once I tossed in 
> 
> 	- PM_EVENT_PRETHAW
> 	- Linus' suspend_late/resume_early and suspend_prepare
> 	- ... and class suspend/resume
> 	- Wakeup events
> 	- Fixes to the existing docs (confusions, obsolete stuff, ...)
> 
> This turned into more of a rewrite.  So here's my current version,
> which I'm circulating for comments; I'll send it as a patch after
> a few days, for merging when those patches from MM go upstream.
> 
> The focus here was just to have the current ("in MM") methods, parameters,
> and models presented, with enough context to help readers understand the
> "why" as well as the "what" and "when" (and the "huh?").
> 
> Yes, seeing it written out this way does beg some questions.  Like
> what can be done with that (here-deprecated) sysfs attribute thing,
> since it's starting to look even more obviously broken.

Few minor comments:

> Bus driver methods
> ------------------
> The core methods to suspend and resume devices reside in struct bus_type.
> These are mostly of interest to people writing infrastructure for busses
> like PCI or USB, or because they define the primitives that device drivers

", or to people defining the primitives" ?

> struct bus_type {
>        ...
>        int  (*suspend_prepare)(struct device * dev, pm_message_t state);
>        int  (*suspend)(struct device * dev, pm_message_t state);
>        int  (*suspend_late)(struct device * dev, pm_message_t state);
> 
>        int  (*resume)(struct device * dev);
>        int  (*resume_early)(struct device * dev);

Swap last two lines, and order will be nicely chronological.

It would be nice to kill space between * and dev to stay consistent.

> For more information on these driver calls, see the description later;
> they are called in phases for every device, respecting the parent-child
> sequencing in the driver model treee.  Note that at this writing,
> not

"at time of this writing"?
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-10 22:25 RFC -- updated Documentation/power/devices.txt David Brownell
2006-07-11  5:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-11 16:38   ` David Brownell
2006-07-11 21:57   ` David Brownell
2006-07-12 12:25     ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-12 14:04     ` Alan Stern
2006-07-12 15:45       ` David Brownell
2006-07-12 16:03         ` Alan Stern
2006-07-23  1:37           ` David Brownell
2006-07-23  3:59             ` Alan Stern
2006-07-23 10:50               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-23 13:03                 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-23 22:45                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-24  3:22                     ` David Brownell
2006-07-24  9:46                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-24 14:51                         ` Alan Stern
2006-07-24 15:15                           ` David Brownell
2006-07-24 15:42                             ` Alan Stern
2006-07-24 17:11                               ` David Brownell
2006-07-24 20:44                                 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-24 21:19                                   ` David Brownell
2006-07-25 15:42                                     ` Alan Stern
2006-08-10 23:38                                     ` [patch 2.6.18-rc] " David Brownell
2006-07-23 16:22               ` RFC -- " David Brownell
2006-07-11 14:40 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-07-11 21:28 ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11  7:56 Woodruff, Richard
2006-07-11 16:51 ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060711144015.GA1616@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox