From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: [PATCH] Rt-tester makes freezing processes fail. Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:18:43 +1000 Message-ID: <200607140918.49040.nigel@suspend2.net> Reply-To: nigel@suspend2.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1519839.1496W9ZNkl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Linux-pm list , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1519839.1496W9ZNkl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. Compiling in the rt-tester currently makes freezing processes fail. I don't think there's anything wrong with it running during suspending, so adding PF_NOFREEZE to the flags set seems to be the right solution. Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham rtmutex-tester.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -ruNp 9971-rt-tester.patch-old/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c 9971-rt-tester.= patch-new/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c =2D-- 9971-rt-tester.patch-old/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c 2006-07-07 10:27:46.= 000000000 +1000 +++ 9971-rt-tester.patch-new/kernel/rtmutex-tester.c 2006-07-14 07:48:01.00= 0000000 +1000 @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int test_func(void *data) struct test_thread_data *td =3D data; int ret; =20 =2D current->flags |=3D PF_MUTEX_TESTER; + current->flags |=3D PF_MUTEX_TESTER | PF_NOFREEZE; allow_signal(SIGHUP); =20 for(;;) { --nextPart1519839.1496W9ZNkl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEttTYN0y+n1M3mo0RAjGRAJwL5ubwjpA0odnoeTXhk6r8Vmb4oACglwTR JmR0MHTeNk+dSS3M0jh2YYI= =TpOi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1519839.1496W9ZNkl--