From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: RFC -- updated Documentation/power/devices.txt
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:50:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607231250.33839.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0607222334510.10239-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
On Sunday 23 July 2006 05:59, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, David Brownell wrote:
]--snip--[
> Some simple questions may help start the ball rolling. During a system
> resume, should all devices be powered on full,
IMHO that would be wasteful.
> or should they be restored to the state they were in before the suspend?
> Or should there be a third possibility -- maybe some devices always on,
> others the way they were?
I think the devices that were on before the suspend should stay on, because
that's what the user will expect to happen. For the same reason the devices
that had been switched off explicitly ("by the user") before the suspend
should stay off. For the others, the rule of thumb may be "off".
> And who decides? The driver?
I don't think the driver should decide. It just may have too little
information to make a proper decision.
Greetings,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-23 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-10 22:25 RFC -- updated Documentation/power/devices.txt David Brownell
2006-07-11 5:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-11 16:38 ` David Brownell
2006-07-11 21:57 ` David Brownell
2006-07-12 12:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-12 14:04 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-12 15:45 ` David Brownell
2006-07-12 16:03 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-23 1:37 ` David Brownell
2006-07-23 3:59 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-23 10:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2006-07-23 13:03 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-23 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-24 3:22 ` David Brownell
2006-07-24 9:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-24 14:51 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-24 15:15 ` David Brownell
2006-07-24 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-24 17:11 ` David Brownell
2006-07-24 20:44 ` Alan Stern
2006-07-24 21:19 ` David Brownell
2006-07-25 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-10 23:38 ` [patch 2.6.18-rc] " David Brownell
2006-07-23 16:22 ` RFC -- " David Brownell
2006-07-11 14:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-11 21:28 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11 7:56 Woodruff, Richard
2006-07-11 16:51 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607231250.33839.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox