From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Cc: patrick.mochel@intel.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Matthew Locke <matt@nomadgs.com>,
sampsa.fabritius@nokia.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerOP Take 3, sysfs UI core 2/5
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:48:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607241149.01700.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060724172954.GC1926@elf.ucw.cz>
On Monday 24 July 2006 10:29 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> That looks quite ugly to do in sysfs, indeed.
Yes, it's long been one of the things I most dislike about this PowerOP thing.
Not just the UI, but the models it reflects.
So I was glad to see it split out as fully optional... although from what I
see, the internal models in the code have derived from this sysfs model, so
I'd argue those need to change too.
It'd be lots better to just have named operating points that get selected just
the /sys/power/state file selects the, erm, "sleep point".
> But better run this by lkml.
I'd rather see some rough consensus on this list that this is the right way
to head, before running things like this by LKML.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-24 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-20 19:56 [RFC] PowerOP Take 3, sysfs UI core 2/5 Eugeny S. Mints
2006-07-20 20:00 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-07-24 17:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-24 18:48 ` David Brownell [this message]
2006-07-24 19:35 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-24 19:40 ` Matthew Locke
2006-07-24 21:46 ` David Brownell
2006-07-24 21:58 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-07-25 0:32 ` David Brownell
2006-07-25 10:09 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-07-26 5:05 ` David Brownell
2006-07-26 7:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-05 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-07 4:31 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-07-26 21:11 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-07-27 0:58 ` David Brownell
2006-07-26 7:44 ` Matthew Locke
2006-07-26 15:03 ` Christian Krafft
2006-07-27 0:55 ` David Brownell
2006-08-01 10:45 ` Matthew Locke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-26 23:55 Gross, Mark
2006-08-01 11:16 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-05 12:05 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-27 0:14 Gross, Mark
2006-07-27 0:15 Gross, Mark
2006-07-27 0:30 Gross, Mark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607241149.01700.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=matt@nomadgs.com \
--cc=patrick.mochel@intel.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sampsa.fabritius@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox