From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerOP Take 3, sysfs UI core 2/5 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:46:46 -0700 Message-ID: <200607241446.48366.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <200607241149.01700.david-b@pacbell.net> <20060724193545.GA2806@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060724193545.GA2806@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org Cc: Matthew Locke , patrick.mochel@intel.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, sampsa.fabritius@nokia.com, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Monday 24 July 2006 12:35 pm, Pavel Machek wrote: > = > > > But better run this by lkml. > > = > > I'd rather see some rough consensus on this list that this is the right= way > > to head, before running things like this by LKML. = > = > I meant "they could suggest how to do the sysfs thing, in reasonable > way". Like echo new_config > file is extermely ugly, but perhaps configfs > is suitable? Makes some sense. But I'm still puzzled why _creating_ an operating point would be done outside of the arch/.../board-xx.c file. = - Dave