From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerOP Take 3, sysfs UI core 2/5 Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 12:05:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20060805120504.GA5417@ucw.cz> References: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D01F607DB@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D01F607DB@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Gross, Mark" Cc: "Mochel, Patrick" , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, sampsa.fabritius@nokia.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.net List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >> Please note that the interface is not hooked up with the rest of the > code > >> yet and is provided just for reference/review. > = > Drivers/powerop/powerop_sysfs.c : includes asm/powerop.h and will not > compile on i386. > There are other places where it will not compile for non-omap > architectures. The architecture independent code should build for all > architectures. > = > Now just rambling a bit, while catching up on the email thread some of > this may be wrong but.... > = > Is it realistic to have the dimensionality of the operating points > defined at the architecture level? Why couldn't there be multiple types > of operating points based on presence of different peripherals? Having > the array defined at compile time seems wrong. Couldn't the platform It is complex enough already, please don't overdesign it even more. Pavel -- = Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.