From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: PowerOp Design and working patch Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:58:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20060807165841.GB6849@kroah.com> References: <200608071412.k77ECEQD009852@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608071412.k77ECEQD009852@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Scott E. Preece" Cc: daviado@gmail.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, dsingleton@mvista.com, pavel@ucw.cz List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:12:14AM -0500, Scott E. Preece wrote: > = > While I think it makes sense to treat a list as a "single value" in this > kind of case A simple list, like what we have today in /sys/power/state, yes. But with paramater information? no. >, a reasonable alternative would be to make /sys/power/supported_states >a directory, with separate files for each supported OP. Sure, if you want to do that, fine. But then you are looking a lot like configfs :) thanks, greg k-h