Re: PowerOp Design and working patch

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

> >> Often, in the embedded world, the person defining the operating
> >> states will not be a kernel developer, and may not be comfortable
> >> with, or capable of, creating a kernel module.  (There are
> > 
> > That's okay, we can create HOWTO or something. 'System designed is too
> > stupid to hack kernel' should not be an argument.
> 
> It's not a matter of stupidity.  The example I gave of not being
> able to create a kernel module was the situation where loadable
> module support is not available.  A HOWTO wouldn't alter this.

So they need to recompile the kernel. Not a big deal when you are
developing new machine.

> > Maybe operating points need to be changed at runtime -- I do not think
> > so -- but *please* get the basic stuff in/merged ASAP and then add
> > features one-by-one.
> 
> I agree. :-)

Yes, I believe we are actually in agreement. Maybe features you want
will indeed be useful, but we want to get basics right, first.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html