From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: PowerOp Design and working patch Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:52:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20060808135247.GA4624@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200608081344.k78DiY0t002356@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608081344.k78DiY0t002356@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Scott E. Preece" Cc: daviado@gmail.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, dsingleton@mvista.com List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! A: No. Q: Should I top-post? > If you're a device manufacturer, and you build, say 50 devices that all > use the same hardware but, because they are optimized for different > functional use cases, have different preferred operating points and > DVFS policies, it's *highly* desirable to not have to maintain 50 > separate builds for those devices. Putting configuration information > in places that can be changed independently of compilation is very > important to us. You'll still need to maintain 50 different userlands, so I do not think that issue is _so_ important. Anyway, lets get in core first, than talk about userspace interface for chanig operating points, ok? Pavel -- = (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html