From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] swsusp: Fix handling of highmem Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:34:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20060813223449.GG6231@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200608091152.49094.rjw@sisk.pl> <200608092047.13493.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060809113822.GQ3308@elf.ucw.cz> <200608092152.11122.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608092152.11122.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , Linux PM List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed 2006-08-09 21:52:10, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On Wednesday 09 August 2006 21:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > Comments welcome. > > > > > > Thanks for the reminder. I'd forgotten half the reason why I didn't want > > > to make Suspend2 into incremental patches! You're a brave man! > > > > Why does this serve as a reminder? No, it is not easy to merge big > > patches to mainline. But it is actually a feature. > > It serves as a reminder because it shows (just the description, I mean), how > inter-related all the changes that are needed are. > > I don't get the "it is actually a feature" bit. Well, it is good that submitting patches is hard ... because kernel ends cleaner that way. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html