Re: BUG while suspending to swap on LVM

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Tuesday 15 August 2006 00:29, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 14.08.2006 23:37, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > On Monday 14 August 2006 23:25, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >> Le 14.08.2006 22:50, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> >>> On Monday 14 August 2006 22:03, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >>>> Le 14.08.2006 21:16, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> >>>>> On Monday 14 August 2006 19:48, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 14.08.2006 19:30, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > ]--snip--[
> >>>> Does it mean it was mistaken on swap device ?
> >>> Yes.  If your resume device is not the first swap, it won't work without
> >>> the patch.
> >> Ok, that's why I had that strange behaviour:
> >> - 2 swap devices online, suspend to second one: suspend works.
> >> - on resume, it can't find suspend signature on the 2nd swap device, so
> >>   it continue with normal boot, fsck all FS and say something like "swapon: 
> >>   1st swap device busy". I had to mkswap it.
> >>
> >> I was thinking that my initrd script was broken or I was mistyping the resume 
> >> device name in GRUB. Was funny...
> > 
> > Sorry for that.
> > 
> > This is not related to the BUG you've reported, but could you please try to
> > suspend using the second swap as your resume partition with a patched kernel,
> > just to make sure the patch works?  I have no boxes with two swaps to verify
> > this ...
> 
> It seems to always suspend to the first swap device, despite your patch.

Strange.

Well, thanks for testing!

Rafael


-- 
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
		R. Buckminster Fuller