public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Eugeny S. Mints" <eugeny.mints@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerOP, PowerOP Core 1/3
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:37:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060815203756.GI4032@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44D7EA4D.1020001@gmail.com>

Hi!

> diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
> index fc2d744..f8eaf31 100644
> --- a/drivers/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ISDN)		+= isdn/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC)		+= edac/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MCA)		+= mca/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EISA)		+= eisa/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_POWEROP)		+= powerop/

Can we make it drivers/power? It is probably suitable for more than
powerop.

> +static int
> +get_point(void *md_opt, const char *pwr_params, va_list args)
> +{

Uhuh... is there a way to use something safer than unchecked va_list
s?


> +int 
> +powerop_driver_register(struct powerop_driver *p)
> +{
> +	int error = 0;
> +
> +	if (! powerop_driver) {

No space between ! and argument...

> +/* 
> + * powerop_register_point - add new operating point with a given name to
> + * operating points list. A caller passes power parameters for new operating
> + * points as pairs of name/value and passes only those parameter names the
> + * caller is interested in. PowerOP Core calls powerop driver to initialize
> + * arch dependent part of new operating point and links new named operating 
> + * point to the list maintained by PowerOP Core
> + * 
> + *
> + * INPUT
> + *   id         - operating point name
> + *   pwr_params - set of (power parameter name, value) pairs
> + *
> + * OUTPUT
> + *   none
> + *
> + * RETURN
> + *   zero on success, error code otherwise
> + *    
> + */
> +int 
> +powerop_register_point(const char *id, const char *pwr_params, ...)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +	struct powerop_point *opt;
> +	va_list args;
> +
> +	if ((!powerop_initialized) || (id == NULL))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((opt = kmalloc(sizeof(struct powerop_point), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	memset(opt, 0, sizeof(struct powerop_point));

kzalloc?

Why do we want one more string parser in kernel?

							Pavel
-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-15 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-08  1:35 [RFC] PowerOP, PowerOP Core 1/3 Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-15 20:37 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-08-17 22:23   ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-24  8:04     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060815203756.GI4032@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=eugeny.mints@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox