From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Use suspend_console in swsusp and make it configureable
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:37:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060816113722.GD9497@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608161304.51758.rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi!
> > > The appended patch does the following:
> > >
> > > 1) Adds suspend_console() and resume_console() to the suspend-to-disk code
> > > paths so that people using netconsole are safe with swsusp.
>
> So I assume this one is OK.
>
> > > 2) Adds a Kconfig option allowing us to disable suspend_/resume_console()
> > > if need be.
> >
> > Slightly ugly, but I guess that is the way to go.
>
> It also seems to be needed to add a 2 sec. dealy in suspend_console() so
> that eg. the network console can send the messages before we try to suspend
> the device.
>
> > > 3) Marks CONFIG_PM_TRACE as dangerous.
> >
> > I do not think that is enough. "(WILL TRASH YOUR CMOS)" would be more
> > suitable. Dangerous is "may cause problems to you". This is "will
> > cause problems to you". And for this to be useful, people have to edit
> > sources, anyway.
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > Can we just delete the config option?
>
> OK, I'll do that.
>
> I have divided the changes into three individual patches that will follow as
> replies to this message.
Ack on all three... and thanks.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-16 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-15 13:09 [RFC][PATCH] PM: Use suspend_console in swsusp and make it configureable Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-16 10:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-16 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-16 11:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] swsusp: Use suspend_console Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-16 11:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] PM: Make console suspending configureable Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-04 9:08 ` Stefan Seyfried
2006-09-04 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-04 11:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 21:27 ` Laurent Riffard
2006-08-16 11:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] PM: Remove PM_TRACE from Kconfig Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-17 4:40 ` Greg KH
2006-08-17 5:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-17 9:12 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2006-08-17 11:52 ` Greg KH
2006-08-16 11:37 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-08-16 12:34 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Use suspend_console in swsusp and make it configureable Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060816113722.GD9497@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@osdl.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox