From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: David Singleton <daviado@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:30:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060820033044.GA24928@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b324b5ad0608192020n6584f749h501e05e141b1f557@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 08:20:45PM -0700, David Singleton wrote:
> If I had all the existing cpufreq tables transformed
> into operating points I could make a patch that would remove
> the bulk of cpufreq code from the kernel and you'd have
> pretty much the same functionality without the maintenance
> issues the added layers and complexity bring.
If this is going to fly at all, I think thats where we need to be headed.
Having two parts of the kernel doing the same thing just seems
very wrong to me.
The other alternative as suggested earlier this week would be archictures
getting to 'opt out' of powerop for their cpufreq drivers where it doesn't
necessarily bring anything but the layer of indirection.
I'm about to disappear for two weeks for a much needed vacation, but
I'll be interested to see other folks comments/opinions on this
when I get back.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-20 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-14 20:07 So, what's the status on the recent patches here? Greg KH
2006-08-14 22:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 22:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-14 23:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 1:00 ` Greg KH
2006-08-15 3:03 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 10:35 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-15 19:04 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-16 12:58 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 10:02 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 15:29 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-18 17:54 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 21:05 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-20 13:19 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 5:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-17 7:20 ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-17 9:18 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-17 21:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 5:42 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-23 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-23 15:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-24 12:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-25 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 23:26 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 13:30 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-28 16:40 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-28 17:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 7:51 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 22:13 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-30 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 11:48 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-24 7:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-30 11:00 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-30 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 13:44 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-02 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-17 21:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:10 ` David Singleton
2006-08-22 2:13 ` Greg KH
2006-08-22 5:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-23 19:05 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-24 12:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:19 ` David Singleton
[not found] ` <20060819184843.GB15644@redhat.com>
2006-08-20 3:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-20 3:30 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-08-23 18:50 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 4:37 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 15:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 15:55 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 16:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 17:49 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 6:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:26 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 0:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-31 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-02 18:05 ` David Singleton
2006-09-02 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 16:25 ` David Singleton
2006-09-03 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 21:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 0:39 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 0:48 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 16:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 15:11 ` David Singleton
2006-09-11 17:14 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 18:58 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 4:52 ` David Singleton
2006-08-30 5:52 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:39 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-27 19:48 ` Greg KH
2006-08-28 0:07 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 20:54 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 21:46 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-29 1:29 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 22:39 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-31 13:27 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-31 19:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-01 8:11 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-14 23:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Matthew Locke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-16 1:27 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-16 15:25 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-20 13:36 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-23 19:20 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 12:16 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 14:52 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 19:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 20:05 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 20:22 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:34 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 21:46 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 2:21 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 20:57 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:21 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:11 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 0:52 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-31 2:41 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 15:14 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-01 14:49 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:21 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 21:34 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 22:12 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:31 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:40 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 16:45 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-06 10:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 23:00 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 23:05 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 15:43 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 16:03 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-06 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060820033044.GA24928@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=daviado@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox