* Voltage/power domain framework? [not found] <mailman.2682.1156469445.1142.linux-pm@lists.osdl.org> @ 2006-08-25 7:50 ` Ikhwan Lee 2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross 2006-08-26 13:13 ` Paul Mundt 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ikhwan Lee @ 2006-08-25 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-pm I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of voltage/power domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web. Ikhwan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Voltage/power domain framework? 2006-08-25 7:50 ` Voltage/power domain framework? Ikhwan Lee @ 2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross 2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee 2006-08-26 13:13 ` Paul Mundt 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark Gross @ 2006-08-25 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ikhwan Lee; +Cc: linux-pm On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 04:50:42PM +0900, Ikhwan Lee wrote: > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of voltage/power > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web. > There isn't anything formal going on. However; there is a loose collection of folks working on the "operating point" patches with an eye to defining a lower level interface to enable voltage/power/clock domain framework's. This activity is fall out from last April's PM-summit http://lwn.net/Articles/181888/, one can also infer the interested parties from the mail activity on this list. Do you have some design ideas, patches, or requirements in this area that could be taken into account? --mgross ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Voltage/power domain framework? 2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross @ 2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee 2006-08-27 18:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints 2006-08-28 20:24 ` Mark Gross 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ikhwan Lee @ 2006-08-27 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mgross; +Cc: linux-pm Thanks for your note, > > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of voltage/power > > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were > > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web. > > There isn't anything formal going on. However; there is a loose > collection of folks working on the "operating point" patches with an eye > to defining a lower level interface to enable voltage/power/clock domain > framework's. I have been following the threads on both PowerOp and OpPoint; however, I never thought they would do the job of voltage/power/clock domain frameworks. The way I interpreted is that they _need_ the domain frameworks so that they could handle lower-level physics better. > Do you have some design ideas, patches, or requirements in this area that could be > taken into account? I have requirements and some very rough ideas. And I was searching for an existing implementation or a discussion so that I can find a place to start with. Maybe we can start by writing down the requirements. As far as I know, the CELF PM Requirement document does not have a section for voltage/power domain frameworks. Regards, Ikhwan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Voltage/power domain framework? 2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee @ 2006-08-27 18:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints 2006-08-28 20:24 ` Mark Gross 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Eugeny S. Mints @ 2006-08-27 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ikhwan Lee; +Cc: linux-pm 2006/8/27, Ikhwan Lee <ikhwan.lee@samsung.com>: > Thanks for your note, > > > > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of > voltage/power > > > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were > > > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web. > > > > There isn't anything formal going on. However; there is a loose > > collection of folks working on the "operating point" patches with an eye > > to defining a lower level interface to enable voltage/power/clock domain > > framework's. > > I have been following the threads on both PowerOp and OpPoint; however, I > never thought they would do the job of voltage/power/clock domain > frameworks. The way I interpreted is that they _need_ the domain frameworks > so that they could handle lower-level physics better. OpPoint does not have any integration with voltage/clock framework idea what is completely unaccepted considering the announced goals for OpPoint. Yes, clock/voltage framework is separate entity and PowerOP does not do the job of clock/voltage framewrok because PowerOP is completely different layer. But PowerOP is only a part of PM framework Matt and I are proposing and PowerOP leverages clock/voltage framework as the lowest layer in the PM framework - PowerOP sits on top of PM Core while PM Core interacts directly with clock/voltage framework (please see PM framework architecture picture overview in my patch set postings). Clock framework is implemented for omap1/2 arches and is utilized by PM Core for omap in my previous posts of PowerOP. Thanks, Eugeny > > Do you have some design ideas, patches, or requirements in this area that > could be > > taken into account? > > I have requirements and some very rough ideas. And I was searching for an > existing implementation or a discussion so that I can find a place to start > with. Maybe we can start by writing down the requirements. As far as I know, > the CELF PM Requirement document does not have a section for voltage/power > domain frameworks. > > Regards, > Ikhwan > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-pm mailing list > linux-pm@lists.osdl.org > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Voltage/power domain framework? 2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee 2006-08-27 18:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints @ 2006-08-28 20:24 ` Mark Gross 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Mark Gross @ 2006-08-28 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ikhwan Lee; +Cc: linux-pm On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:48:01PM +0900, Ikhwan Lee wrote: > Thanks for your note, > > > > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of > voltage/power > > > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were > > > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web. > > > > There isn't anything formal going on. However; there is a loose > > collection of folks working on the "operating point" patches with an eye > > to defining a lower level interface to enable voltage/power/clock domain > > framework's. > > I have been following the threads on both PowerOp and OpPoint; however, I > never thought they would do the job of voltage/power/clock domain > frameworks. The way I interpreted is that they _need_ the domain frameworks > so that they could handle lower-level physics better. > > > Do you have some design ideas, patches, or requirements in this area that > could be > > taken into account? > > I have requirements and some very rough ideas. And I was searching for an > existing implementation or a discussion so that I can find a place to start > with. Maybe we can start by writing down the requirements. As far as I know, > the CELF PM Requirement document does not have a section for voltage/power > domain frameworks. If you provide me with content then I would be happy to add such a section or welcome you to edit the public wiki yourself ;) --mgross ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Voltage/power domain framework? 2006-08-25 7:50 ` Voltage/power domain framework? Ikhwan Lee 2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross @ 2006-08-26 13:13 ` Paul Mundt 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul Mundt @ 2006-08-26 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ikhwan Lee; +Cc: linux-pm, sampsa.fabritius On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 04:50:42PM +0900, Ikhwan Lee wrote: > I've seen quite a few discussions mentioning the necessity of voltage/power > domain framework. Is there any project going on? I heard that there were > some activities by Nokia, but I could not find any on the web. > Yes, Nokia did some work on OMAP for this that could probably be generalized. It doesn't seem like it's been posted anywhere yet though, Sampsa? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-28 20:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <mailman.2682.1156469445.1142.linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
2006-08-25 7:50 ` Voltage/power domain framework? Ikhwan Lee
2006-08-25 18:00 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 11:48 ` Ikhwan Lee
2006-08-27 18:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 20:24 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-26 13:13 ` Paul Mundt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox