From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: T60 not coming out of suspend to RAM
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:25:35 -0700
Message-ID: <20060828122535.911e593a.akpm@osdl.org>
References: <20060828154242.GB30105@elf.ucw.cz>
	<20060828171926.GB25491@mellanox.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060828171926.GB25491@mellanox.co.il>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/linux-pm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm>,
	<mailto:linux-pm-request@lists.osdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org
Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-pm@osdl.org, Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:19:26 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il> wrote:

> Quoting r. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>:
> > Subject: Re: T60 not coming out of suspend to RAM
> > =

> > On Mon 2006-08-28 16:53:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > OK, it turns out the problem was with running SATA drive in AHCI mode.
> > > =

> > > After applying the following patch from Forrest Zhao
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/20/56
> > > both suspend to disk and suspend to ram work fine now.
> > > This patch is going into 2.6.18, isn't it?
> > =

> > Not sure, check latest -rc5, and if it is not there, ask akpm...
> > =

> =

> Andrew, this is going into 2.6.18, isn't it? I don't see it in -rc5.
> =


It looks like Forrest's stuff is all queued up in the libata devel tree,
although in a significantly different-looking form.

So no, right now it doesn't look good for 2.6.18.