Re: PowerOP, Intro 0/3

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

On Sun 2006-08-27 14:34:06, Eugeny S. Mints wrote:
> 2006/8/26, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>:

> >> >I do not think this can work in notebook world, sorry.
> >> >You'll just get
> >> >way too many operating points.
> >> The only feature for notebook world currently presented
> >> in the kernel is CPUFreq. CPUFreq PowerOP integration
> >
> >Actually no. In the notebook world, we do cpufreq, selective powerdown
> >of devices (/sys/**/power/state), and suspend-to-ram/disk (not sure if
> >it applies to you, but at least some powerop versions wanted to
> >replace that).
> integration with legacy PM kernel code is the next step for PowerOP.
> There is no chance to address all in one step. We need to go step by
> step.

Ok, but I guess I can't review it unless you do all the steps, and it
seems to me you are going into the wrong direction now.

> >> </personal> Pavel,
> >> please stop removing original recipients from either TO:
> >> or CC: lists!
> >> please, when you snip original message _do_not_ snip
> >> names of replied persons!
> >> </end>
> >
> >Do you have example where I did that?
> This thread is example of both: original letter in this thread has 3
> recepients while in your first reply there is noone.
> And there is no a name of reply originator between your 'Hi' and
> '>>>>' signes while for example I have  '2006/8/26, Pavel Machek
> <pavel@ucw.cz>' in this reply.

Ok, so you care about attribution lines. I'll try to keep them.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html