From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: T60 not coming out of suspend to RAM Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:19:34 +0300 Message-ID: <20060828201934.GA26544@mellanox.co.il> References: <20060828122535.911e593a.akpm@osdl.org> Reply-To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060828122535.911e593a.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jeff Garzik , Pavel Machek , linux-pm@osdl.org, Thomas Glanzmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Quoting r. Andrew Morton : > Subject: Re: T60 not coming out of suspend to RAM > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:19:26 +0300 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > Quoting r. Pavel Machek : > > > Subject: Re: T60 not coming out of suspend to RAM > > > > > > On Mon 2006-08-28 16:53:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > OK, it turns out the problem was with running SATA drive in AHCI mode. > > > > > > > > After applying the following patch from Forrest Zhao > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/20/56 > > > > both suspend to disk and suspend to ram work fine now. > > > > This patch is going into 2.6.18, isn't it? > > > > > > Not sure, check latest -rc5, and if it is not there, ask akpm... > > > > > > > Andrew, this is going into 2.6.18, isn't it? I don't see it in -rc5. > > > > It looks like Forrest's stuff is all queued up in the libata devel tree, > although in a significantly different-looking form. > > So no, right now it doesn't look good for 2.6.18. > Ugh, more's the pity :( How about merging this one patch? T60 is only half as useful without it (no disk after resume), and the rate of changes in libata is high so just using a patch is gonnu be painful in the long run. -- MST