From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: T60 not coming out of suspend to RAM Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:46:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20060830144646.GC1923@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060828122535.911e593a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060828201934.GA26544@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060828201934.GA26544@mellanox.co.il> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-pm@osdl.org, Thomas Glanzmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeff Garzik List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > > > OK, it turns out the problem was with running SATA drive in AHCI = mode. > > > > > = > > > > > After applying the following patch from Forrest Zhao > > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/20/56 > > > > > both suspend to disk and suspend to ram work fine now. > > > > > This patch is going into 2.6.18, isn't it? > > > > = > > > > Not sure, check latest -rc5, and if it is not there, ask akpm... > > > > = > > > = > > > Andrew, this is going into 2.6.18, isn't it? I don't see it in -rc5. > > > = > > = > > It looks like Forrest's stuff is all queued up in the libata devel tree, > > although in a significantly different-looking form. > > = > > So no, right now it doesn't look good for 2.6.18. > > = > = > Ugh, more's the pity :( > How about merging this one patch? T60 is only half as useful without it (= no disk > after resume), and the rate of changes in libata is high so just using a = patch > is gonnu be painful in the long run. I guess you need to convince SATA maintainer that patch is safe before it can go in... Pavel -- = (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html