From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.18-rc-mm] PM: platform_bus and late_suspend/early_resume Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:04:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20060902040444.GA18087@kroah.com> References: <20060902035114.4C154195C8B@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060902035114.4C154195C8B@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: David Brownell Cc: torvalds@osdl.com.kroah.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:51:14PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > = > Teach platform_bus about the new suspend_late/resume_early PM calls, > issued with IRQs off. Do we really need sysdev and friends any more, > or can janitors start switching its users over to platform_device so > we can do a minor code-ectomy? I don't think we need it anymore, but you should ask the cpu people, they seem to love sysdev for some odd reason (probably because they finally get to create a sysfs file, like all the cool driver kids have been doing for years...) If you get their ok, I'm fine with getting rid of it. thanks, greg k-h