From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Scott E. Preece" <preece@motorola.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:09:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060904090935.GK9991@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609032305.k83N5SP9017385@olwen.urbana.css.mot.com>
Hi!
> | > In the implementation we use, the initial OP is set by the boot
> | > loader. Our kernel power management driver is a module. The assumption
> | > is that booting involves a lot of processing and it makes sense to just
> | > use the highest OP anyway. That makes sense in our environment, but I
> | > wouldn't recommend our version as a general solution, anyway.
> |
> | That's actually regression; cpufreq saves power even while booting.
> ---
>
> Well, the kernel boot phase is relatively brief. The module could be
> loaded and managing the OP before you start bringing up the rest of user
> space. However, I'm not arguing that our approach to that is generally
> applicable - I was just giving an existence proof.
powernow-k8 machines can't even run in highest OP point on battery
power.
> | > Hmm. I need to think about that. I guess the OP abstraction *could* be
> | > entirely inside the user-space policy manager, with the kernel exposing
> | > individual interfaces for every parameter that the policy manager would
> | > need to adjust. However, that means that the whole mess has to be at
> | > user level (kernel just implements simple knobs for individual
> | > parameters), because the dependency management between the parameters
> | > would only be known at user level, and means a relatively bulky kernel
> | > interface, since it would expose more things at the interface.
> |
> | That would work for me.
> |
> | But my idea was actually opposite: expose individual knobs to
> | userspace, and then select some operating point (inside kernel) that
> | satisfies given knobs.
> ---
>
> But then the kernel needs to know about the operating points, so aren't
> you back where we were before?
Yes, it will be similar to your solution, but
a) I'll need not use oppoints on PCs where parameters are independend
and
b) I'll still get reasonable user<->kernel interface.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-04 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-03 23:05 So, what's the status on the recent patches here? Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:09 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-05 16:03 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-05 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-06 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 15:43 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 23:00 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 10:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 22:40 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-04 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 16:45 ` Mark Gross
2006-09-06 10:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:31 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:12 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 22:25 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 21:34 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-03 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 21:21 Scott E. Preece
2006-09-03 21:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-01 14:49 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-31 15:14 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-31 2:41 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-31 0:52 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-25 22:11 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:21 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:42 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 20:57 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 20:22 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:34 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 21:46 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 2:21 ` Alan Stern
2006-08-25 20:05 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 20:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 14:52 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-25 19:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-24 12:16 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-23 19:20 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-24 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-20 13:36 Woodruff, Richard
2006-08-16 1:27 Scott E. Preece
2006-08-16 15:25 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-14 20:07 Greg KH
2006-08-14 22:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 22:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-14 23:24 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 1:00 ` Greg KH
2006-08-15 3:03 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 10:35 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-15 19:04 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-16 12:58 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 21:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 10:02 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 15:29 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-18 17:54 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-18 21:05 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-08-20 13:19 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-17 5:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-17 7:20 ` Paul Mundt
2006-08-17 9:18 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-17 21:40 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 5:42 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-23 12:28 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-23 15:26 ` Igor Stoppa
2006-08-24 12:58 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-25 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-25 23:26 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-26 13:30 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-08-26 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-28 16:40 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-28 17:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 7:51 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 22:13 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-30 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-18 11:48 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-24 7:59 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-30 11:00 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-30 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 13:44 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-09-02 11:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-17 21:24 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:10 ` David Singleton
2006-08-22 2:13 ` Greg KH
2006-08-22 5:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-23 19:05 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-24 12:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-19 6:19 ` David Singleton
[not found] ` <20060819184843.GB15644@redhat.com>
2006-08-20 3:20 ` David Singleton
2006-08-20 3:30 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-23 18:50 ` Mark Gross
2006-08-27 4:37 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 15:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 15:55 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 16:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 17:49 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 6:20 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:26 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-31 0:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-31 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-02 18:05 ` David Singleton
2006-09-02 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 16:25 ` David Singleton
2006-09-03 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-09-03 21:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 0:39 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 0:48 ` David Singleton
2006-09-09 16:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-09 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 15:11 ` David Singleton
2006-09-11 17:14 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-11 18:58 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 4:52 ` David Singleton
2006-08-30 5:52 ` Matthew Locke
2006-08-30 13:39 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-08-30 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-27 19:48 ` Greg KH
2006-08-28 0:07 ` David Singleton
2006-08-27 20:54 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-28 22:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-29 21:46 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-29 1:29 ` David Singleton
2006-08-29 22:39 ` Eugeny S. Mints
2006-08-31 13:27 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-31 19:22 ` Preece Scott-PREECE
2006-09-01 8:11 ` Amit Kucheria
2006-08-14 23:29 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-08-14 23:48 ` Matthew Locke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060904090935.GK9991@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=preece@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox