From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here? Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 16:13:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20060909161302.GA4605@ucw.cz> References: <1ac6c8e2a817eb0e11257b47199872f8@comcast.net> <200609022130.59256.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060903213325.GB9991@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: David Singleton Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hi! On Fri 08-09-06 17:48:13, David Singleton wrote: > I've been off doing real work for a while but = > I've finally got some time > to work on SMP and device constraints for the = > oppoint patch set. Could you teach your mail client not to insert tabs at begining of line, and inline your patches? > Once I get SMP working well I'm going to spend = > some time thinking > about suspend operating states. The pm_ops = > structure looks > suspicioulsy like a subset of the oppoint = > structure. If I can Just because a is subset of b does not mean that merging a and b is good idea. Pavel -- = Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.