Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP [Was: Re: So, what's the status on the recent patches here?]

Matthew Locke
2006-09-11T22:08:54Z

On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Mark Gross wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:36PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> No, I'm not ready to ACK. Actually I'd describe it as "broken piece of
>> code noone needs". And IIRC Greg's last question was "what is it good
>> for?". Dave Jones was not too pleased with cpufreq/powerop
>> integration. Intel people explained you broke centrino
>> speedstep. Shall I continue?
>>
>
> Those where directed to the other patch that David Singleton posted.
>

Right.

Pavel and others, I know its confusing having the two. Let's focus
on just PowerOP. The PowerOP patches are just powerop and do not
affect other subsystems or existing PM code. The other stuff (cpufreq
integration, suspend/resume integration) can come later. Nothing in
PowerOP prevents us from adding more later.

>
>> Pavel
>> --
>> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>> (cesky, pictures)
>> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>