From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: OpPoint summary Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:58:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20060917125834.GK2741@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060911195546.GB11901@elf.ucw.cz> <4505CCDA.8020501@gmail.com> <20060911210026.GG11901@elf.ucw.cz> <4505DDA6.8080603@gmail.com> <20060911225617.GB13474@elf.ucw.cz> <20060912001701.GC14234@linux.intel.com> <20060912033700.GD27397@kroah.com> <20060914055529.GA18031@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Singleton Cc: Greg KH , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, kernel list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Sat 2006-09-16 22:07:15, David Singleton wrote: > Pavel and Greg, > > I've incorporated Pavels suggestions and only put suspend states > in the /sys/power/state file. The control file for frequency and > voltage operating > point transitions is now in > /sys/power/operating_points/current_point. Ouch and it still needs description of your proposed user<->kernel interface, explanation why it is good thing (I do not thing it is), and probably explanation why you are competing with powerOP framework, rather than working with them. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html